Marine Gearing Analysis

Comparison of similarities between two stress analysis methods: computer-aided FEA and photoelasticity (2% Circular white light, 0 degree principle stress angle)

In this case study, a hypothetical client approaches us to diagnose the cause of why the gears in a high-speed marine gearbox broke easier than expected. Hence, I ran a FEA analysis of the gear tooth and compared to the photoelasticity results to locate the area where cracking most likely happens.

Role

Mechanical Analyst

Highlights

  • The FEA results from ANSYS closely match the data I calculated from the photoelasticity images, with stresses reach up to 133 MPa.

  • This was my first project where FEA stress analysis is the primary focus. This project taught me how to use ANSYS, how it works, and why it is a powerful tool.

  • Calculated the principle stress difference using the fringe order derived from the photoelasticity images.

Tools

ANSYS Mechanical | Camera | Calculator

Isoclinic patterns at 2%, 3%, and 4% load respectively. Notice the increasing pattern complexity with each load increase.

Previous
Previous

Driver Chain Guard

Next
Next

Hobbyist CNC Machine